top of page

【Value vs. Growth】Are These Labels Just Marketing? 🤨 by Jadewell Family Office

  • Ann Yu
  • 2 days ago
  • 2 min read

Most investors have heard of the two major “schools” of equity investing: Value and Growth.


Warren Buffett is seen as the master of Value investing — buying high‑quality companies at attractive valuations.


Meanwhile, many “young stock gurus” gain fame through Growth stocks, riding explosive momentum during bull markets.


But here’s the twist: these labels are actually just marketing constructs.



===



Over the long run, Growth stocks have massively outperformed Value stocks...Until this year


Looking at long-term performance:


🔴Russell 1000 Growth: 415% total return over the past decade (≈ 18% per year)

🟢Russell 1000 Value: 184% total return over the past decade (≈ 11% per year)



Yet this trend flipped in the first half of this year:


🔴Russell 1000 Growth: +5%

🟢Russell 1000 Value: +16%


Some readers may already be jumping to conclusions: “Got it — you’re going to say the AI bubble is peaking and Value is coming back.”


Not quite. ⛔


If you only look at the headline, it’s easy to think Value beat Growth because AI is topping out.


😈But the devil is in the details.😈


===


 The “Value stocks” you think you’re buying… aren’t actually Value stocks anymore


Look at Value Index's holdings in Q1 this year:

  • Micron (MU) ranked #10

  • Caterpillar (CAT) ranked #15


Both were major beneficiaries of the AI wave and helped to push up the Value Index. In the first half of 2026

  • Micron: +305% 

  • Caterpillar: +87%


But due to historical valuation and cycle characteristics, index providers still classified them as “Value.”


Only in May — after their explosive growth — were they reclassified into the Growth index.


===


Growth stocks lagged this year partly because of index concentration


As for the Growth Index, just Nvidia + Apple + Google already make up 30%+ of the index because it's Market Cap weighted.


These mega‑caps underperformed relative to Micron and other “former Value stocks,” which is why Growth lagged Value this year.


😎It has nothing to do with an AI bubble.


===


The real takeaway: No company is permanently or purely “Value” or “Growth”


Companies shift across categories as industry cycles, valuations, and growth rates evolve.


Just like people aren’t permanently optimistic or pessimistic — the proportions change over time.


When investing, don't jump to conclusions based on labels.


Understanding the underlying details keeps you from being led by marketing narratives.



Risk Disclosure & Disclaimer:


Value vs. Growth



Comments


Start Now
bottom of page